Monday, January 31, 2005

That Liberal Media

What's wrong with this YDN article? The title is "Scientists refute gender claims," referring specifically to the remarks that got Larry Summers in trouble; the subtitle is "Professors say society is responsible for gender imbalance in sciences."

Now it would certainly be news if cognitive science and empirical psychology were able to pinpoint "society" as the sole cause of the underrepresentation of women in math, science, and engineering. But of course, nothing of the sort has happened, and if you look under the fold, the article says as much. Some quotes to ponder:
Studies have shown men and women use different regions of their brains for cognitive tasks. Research by scientists at the Universities of California and New Mexico has shown that use more gray matter and women more white matter.
And:
[F]unctional MRI studies provide evidence that men tend to use the left side of their brains while women employ more diffuse neural systems involving both sides while performing rhyming tasks.
And:
Genetics and psychiatry professor Kenneth Kidd said most neuropsychiatric disorders affect males at a higher frequency than females, and young girls develop language abilities much more quickly than boys of the same age.
And:
Robert Sternberg, a professor of psychology and education, said differences between the sexes exist for specific tasks, but most research does not confirm broad generalizations about superiority in science and math. Men tend to be overrepresented at both the top and bottom of performance scales, he said.

Neurobiology professor Paul Forscher said human brain function is too complex and enigmatic to make any assumptions about cognitive sex differences. While the importance of sex differences in lower animals is more clear-cut, he said, choices are more important in explaining human behavior.
You tell me how to interpret this. I can't interpret it as saying anything other than that there is no basis for drawing conclusions one way or the other about genetically-rooted neurological and cognitive differences between the sexes. Which of course argues (as one of the cited experts does explicitly) for further investigating these differences. It doesn't even remotely "refute gender claims," especially considering that Summers readily acknowledged (who wouldn't) that a large factor in the disparity in representation was societal. There seem to be three plausible explanations of the available data: 1) Whatever disparity exists in performance in these fields is the result of social constraints; 2) Genetics distributes mathematical and scientific skills unevenly, in favor of men; 3) Genetics hard-wires individuals to learn math and science according to differing sex-based neurological pathways, and due to inbuilt discrimination, the female pattern, though no less successful, gets filtered out. Of the three, the last sounds the most plausible to me. But it is a question we just can't answer yet, and scientists aren't capable of saying precisely what causes the gender imbalance, and they wouldn't do so.

Since I know first-hand that op-ed writers have no control over the titles of their pieces, I'm not ready to blame staff reporter Susie Poppick for her article's thoroughly misleading headline. But it's evidence of two nasty syndromes: a creative process by committee, as the headline surely was; and a politically correct Prudenization of a story.

Full disclosure: I'm putting an op-ed in the YDN later this week in which I defend Summers.

1 Comments:

At 7:30 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thank you for deductioning that.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home

Vitals
  • E-mail me: Dan Koffler
  • My YDN Column: Smashing Idols
  • The Reasonsphere
  • Hit & Run
  • Matt Welch
  • Julian Sanchez
  • Jesse Walker
  • Virginia Postrel
  • Tim Cavanaugh
  • Ringers
  • Andrew Sullivan
  • Josh Marshall
  • Crooked Timber
  • Matthew Yglesias
  • Kevin Drum
  • John Cole
  • Leiter Reports
  • Pharyngula
  • Gregory Djerjian
  • Atrios
  • Mickey Kaus
  • Jim Henley
  • Radley Balko
  • TNR's Plank
  • Balkinization
  • Glenn Greenwald
  • Thomas Knapp
  • Justin Logan
  • Laura Rozen
  • Mark Kleiman
  • Print Culture
  • Arthur Silber
  • Tom Tomorrow
  • James Wolcott
  • OxBlog
  • Eric Muller
  • Majikthise
  • Pandagon
  • The American Scene
  • Daniel Drezner
  • Will Wilkinson
  • The Volokh Conspiracy
  • Intel Dump
  • Prequels
  • Johan Ugander
  • Dan Munz
  • Josh Eidelson
  • Future Less Vivid
  • Sequels
  • (not)Delino Deshields
  • Actual God
  • Hidden Hand
  • I am justice
  • Death/Media Incarnate
  • (not)Marquis Grissom
  • Yanqui At Cambridge
  • Beneficent Allah
  • Mr. Wrongway
  • The Hippolytic
  • Discourse Decision
  • Tight Toy Night
  • Mulatto Jesus
  • Sago Boulevard
  • Immortalized Stillicide
  • Nick's Corner
  • Dead Trees
  • Reason
  • Dissent
  • The New Republic
  • The New Yorker
  • The Atlantic Monthly
  • The American Prospect
  • Arts & Letters Daily
  • The Economist
  • The Nation
  • Yale Daily News
  • Virtual Reality
  • Wikipedia
  • Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
  • Symbolic Logic into HTML
  • Slate
  • Salon
  • The Huffington Post
  • Crooks and Liars
  • The Smoking Gun
  • The Smoking Gun: Bill O'Reilly
  • Romenesko
  • The Christopher Hitchens Web
  • Draft Russ
  • Rotten.com's Library
  • Urban Dictionary
  • Homestar Runner
  • Planet Rugby
  • Flex Online
  • Card Player Magazine
  • Gawker & Such
  • News
  • Politics
  • Gambling
  • Gossip (NY edition)
  • Gossip (LA edition)
  • Cool Shit
  • Cars
  • Video Games
  • Photoshop Fun &c.
  • Travel
  • MacGuyver Yourself
  • Porn
  • Prepare For The Worst
  • Bull Moose Blog
  • The Corner
  • Instapundit
  • Reel Blogs
  • BathTubYoga
  • More TK
  • R.I.P.
  • Jamie Kirchick
  • That Girl