Tyrants in Black Robes Watch
Here's the first of what I hope will be a regular feature. It's going to chronicle high court (Supreme and Federal) decisions that (simultaneously) advance the common lot of mankind and piss off the sort of people who complain about courts advancing a liberal social agenda. So this is installment one:
Put flaming judicial activists like Anthony "God doesn't hate fags" [yeah, right--ed.] Kennedy on the Supreme Court bench and watch as traditional American values---like holding our own citizens indefinitely without rights, representation, specific charges against them, or any (even modestly) near-term expectation of a trial and due process---get whittled away.
Who would have imagined that the highest court in the judiciary might have a problem with unlimited executive power in an inherently judicial affair? Public Citizen/Activist/Looker-Out-For-You Bill O'Reilly at 8pm on how this advances the "Ssssecularist" agenda.
1 Comments:
Why are my tax dollars going to pay for the legal defense of someone who in all likelihood was plotting to destroy me or one of my friends? Surely society must be inverted? Is there a case of such a seemingly obtuse decision in previously recorded history? And if so, did the government that made such a decision last for a long period of time? Perhaps a few of the Justices should ease off on the drugs.
Post a Comment
<< Home