Casual Accusations Of Treason

Okey-doke. This taxonomy of the "conservative" side of the blogosphere---I think that's the wrong word for it, but whatever---got a bunch of attention last week. And it's pretty funny. E.g.:

Calling Glenn Reynolds intellectually lazy would be to praise him. He doesn't write, he grunts. Has gained prominence by posting a lot and never making his audience think; has done those things by never thinking too much himself. Never met a Democrat he couldn't casually accuse of treason.

Which is all objectively true.

Now then, this cat, who is magnanimous enough to proclaim

I've aspired to be more of a "thinker" than a "linker."

was not amused. Of the stuff on Glenn Reynolds, he writes:

No sense citing an example; everyone KNOWS it's true.

Well not EVERYBODY knows it's true. For those who don't, take a look here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, or here.

UPDATE: On the subject of casualness, I was so focused on the Instapundit stuff that I didn't pay much attention to Mithras's attack on Michelle Malkin. Volokher David Bernstein is right; attack Malkin because she's a vile apologist for racism, not because she's a woman or because she's Asian.